BlackChampagne Home

In association with Amazon.comBuy Crap! I get 5%.
Direct donations to cover hosting expenses are also accepted.

Site Information
--What is Black Champagne?
--Cast of Characters & Things
--Your First Time.
--Design Notes
--Quote of the Day Archive
--Phrase of the Moment Archive
--Site Feedback
--Contact/Copyright Info

Blog Archives
--Blogger Archives: June 2005-
--Old Monthly Archives: Jan 2002-May 2005

Reviews Section
Movie Reviews (153)

Ten Most Recent Film Reviews:
--Infernal Affairs -- 5.5
--The Protector/Tom Yum Goong -- 6
--The Limey -- 8
--The Descent -- 6
--Oldboy -- 9.5
--Shaolin Deadly Kicks -- 7
--Mission Impossible III -- 7.5
--V for Vendetta -- 8.5
--Ghost in the Shell 2 -- 8
--Night Watch -- 7.5

Book Reviews (76)
Five Most Recent Book Reviews:
--Cat People -- 4
--Attack Poodles -- 5
--Caught Stealing -- 6
--The Dirt, by Motley Crue -- 7.5
--Harry Potter #6 -- 7

Photos Section
--Flux Photos
--Pet Photos (7 pages)
--Home Decor Photos
--Plant Photos
--Vacation Photos (12 pages)

Articles
See all 234 articles here.

Fiction
Original horror and fantasy short stories.

Mail Bags
Index Page

Features
--Links
--Slang: Internet
--Slang: Dirty
--Slang: Wankisms
--Slang: Sex Acts
--Slang: Fulldeckisms
--Hot or Not?
--Truths in Advertising

Band Name Ratings
(350 Rock Bands Listed)
FAQ -- Feedback
A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- Q -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W -- X -- Y -- Z

Hellgate: London
--The Unofficial HGL Site
--The Hellgate Wiki

Diablo II
--The Unofficial Site
--Flux's Decahedron
--Middle Earth Mod

Locations of visitors to this page

Powered by Blogger.

BlackChampagne -- no longer new; improvement also in question.: Cheerfully Accepting Mediocrity for Positive Mental Health



Friday, September 15, 2006  

Cheerfully Accepting Mediocrity for Positive Mental Health


While replying to a friend's email I wrote a brief analysis of someone we both know, and immodestly thought my comments were faux-insightful enough to edit slightly and repost here, where everyone could read them. Don't bother trying to guess who I'm talking about; you don't know them (well, Malaya does) and he's not a celebrity. Just consider the personality type analysis, and the tragic and self-implicating conclusion I draw at the end.
...he's deceptively bright and can write adequately, but he seems to be missing the critical dose of self loathing (for himself and especially for his creative output) that all successful cynics and writers require. He thinks his merely-adequate features are great, and he is way off in his appreciation for his own comedic efforts, at least judging by the unfunny, 14 y/o skewing stuff he's posted on his site.

He's not a lost cause though; he's shown some shrewd literary appreciation and deprecation; he just isn't quite harsh enough on his own work. Or who knows, perhaps his inner critic is up to snuff and it's his talent that's lacking? Maybe he knows his writing is mediocre at best, but he also knows it's the best he can do, and he's come to terms with that and learned to embrace his limited talent. It's not a bad idea; most readers are perfectly happy with mediocrity, as a glance at the bestseller list will tell you, and if you can only turn out okay stuff, why live in misery, lamenting the brilliance you'll never consistently attain?
Is that conclusion depressing, or uplifting? After all, most people will never be great at anything. Should we chew through our dinner while browbeating ourselves for not being a great cook? Bang our heads against the steering mid U-turn for not being a flawless navigator? Slam our post-coital nuts in the bathroom door for not being an infinitely-energetic lover?

Of course not! (He said, while glancing nervously left and right.) We accept our own shortcomings and limitations in every aspect of life, while (hopefully) striving to improve. Why shouldn't that acceptance extend to our professional or public output? Plenty of creative people fall far short of brilliance with their writing, painting, composing, acting, tackling, pitching, etc. But if they're doing (something clsoe to) the best they can and striving to improve, or at least not regress, why shouldn't they take pride in their production? They're still better than 99% of the people on earth. Should Robert Jordan stop writing The Wheel of Time just because George R. R. Martin is halfway through A Song of Ice and Fire?

Hell yes! He should stop because books 7-10 were the longest squirt of literary autoeroticism this side of every myspace site with a pink background, and... *cough*

Okay, bad example. Sorry about that. My point though, is that good enough sometimes is, and even if you don't love your work, you can accept that it'll never be perfectly perfect, (Assuming you're less delusional than the Good Widow Rice.) but that it's probably good enough. And yes, I tell myself that every day as the editing of my novel drags on, and on, and on, with vanishingly diminishing returns to anyone's eyes but mine.

Labels:

Comments:

Flux, if I said I loved you, would it creep you out? Er... okay, considering your extended experience with the wide world of internet freakazoids, I might want to retract/clarify that phrase. I really mean that I love your comments (most) of the time, and as a newbie writer and digital art student within months of graduation, I've got quite a bit of planning to do so I an ensure a heated living space and more than meatless spaghetti on the table every night. I've always been fond of your work since I started reading during your Diablo 2 days, and I'm glad to hear that even with your good track record, you still strive to climb that infinite mountain of perfection. As I'm sure you know, you're an artist, and as such, are constantly struggling to find new ways to better your craft, even if it means switching your methods, or angle of view, altogether. Even history's best painters didn't paint the same style their whole lives, and they probably didn't wake up one morning, scramble some eggs, and say, "Hey! I'm going to paint in cubism!" It's more likely that the development was much longer, more internally digested, and finally realized. Kind of like a mid-life crisis, only for artists, it happens multiple times, rather irradically, and is often even more difficult for the writer to comprehend than his/her fans.

Your continued work has taught me more than you probably think, and I'll be very glad once I see an Eric Bruce novel on the shelf. I'll read it out of pit--er, respect, and like the rest of your fans, comment back on it, if you wish to hear them.

Anywho, have fun with the editing, and no matter how things turn out in the end, don't beat yourself up too much--if you fall off the mountain, you'll end up in bigger trouble. On the flip side, who knows? Perhaps you'll sell 25 million copies in the first 6 months and before Christmas 07 you'll have 6 more book contracts and a movie deal.

Again, thanks for the help, and I wish you the best combination of personal skill and luck.


 

Most of us do the best we can at what we do.

Not all of us are focused on critiquing our own work, because we have editors, supervisors, bosses, that do that (some better than others).

Eric the Bruce is in a more or less unique position in that he does not have an editor/supervisor/boss.

His blog is a shining example of creativity, and I read it frequently.

That said, I am skeptical he will publish a fantasy novel which sells enough copies to cover publishing costs.

I myself, a technical writer and not as creative as flux/Bruce, can recognize good vs mediocre writing. Nick S, apparently the subject of the Sept. 15 blog on this site, does not appear to be a bad writer as his reasonably well written commentary demonstrates. I have not seen enough of Nick S' work to pass any further judgment. A weblink would probably help.


 

Should Robert Jordan stop writing The Wheel of Time just because George R. R. Martin is halfway through A Song of Ice and Fire?

Hell yes! He should stop because books 7-10 were the longest squirt of literary autoeroticism this side of every myspace site with a pink background, and...


I'm afraid you will get your wish. Robert Jordan is suffering from Amyloids, a disease where some cells in the bone marrow are making long polymers that are deposited in the heart. His first treatment, where his bonemarrow was destroyed and replaced by a few "rescued" cells, failed, and his prospects to live are somewhere between 1-5 years.

Even though I agree that the last five books of the series have been slow and quite mediocre, I still hope he has the time, will and strength to finish his series.

Martin

PS, if you're interested in his story, RJ has his own blog here:
http://www.dragonmount.com/RobertJordan/


 

Post a Comment << Home

Archives

May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2012  

All site content copyright "Flux" (Eric Bruce), 2002-2007.