BlackChampagne Home

In association with Amazon.comBuy Crap! I get 5%.
Direct donations to cover hosting expenses are also accepted.

Site Information
--What is Black Champagne?
--Cast of Characters & Things
--Your First Time.
--Design Notes
--Quote of the Day Archive
--Phrase of the Moment Archive
--Site Feedback
--Contact/Copyright Info

Blog Archives
--Blogger Archives: June 2005-
--Old Monthly Archives: Jan 2002-May 2005

Reviews Section
Movie Reviews (153)

Ten Most Recent Film Reviews:
--Infernal Affairs -- 5.5
--The Protector/Tom Yum Goong -- 6
--The Limey -- 8
--The Descent -- 6
--Oldboy -- 9.5
--Shaolin Deadly Kicks -- 7
--Mission Impossible III -- 7.5
--V for Vendetta -- 8.5
--Ghost in the Shell 2 -- 8
--Night Watch -- 7.5

Book Reviews (76)
Five Most Recent Book Reviews:
--Cat People -- 4
--Attack Poodles -- 5
--Caught Stealing -- 6
--The Dirt, by Motley Crue -- 7.5
--Harry Potter #6 -- 7

Photos Section
--Flux Photos
--Pet Photos (7 pages)
--Home Decor Photos
--Plant Photos
--Vacation Photos (12 pages)

Articles
See all 234 articles here.

Fiction
Original horror and fantasy short stories.

Mail Bags
Index Page

Features
--Links
--Slang: Internet
--Slang: Dirty
--Slang: Wankisms
--Slang: Sex Acts
--Slang: Fulldeckisms
--Hot or Not?
--Truths in Advertising

Band Name Ratings
(350 Rock Bands Listed)
FAQ -- Feedback
A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- Q -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W -- X -- Y -- Z

Hellgate: London
--The Unofficial HGL Site
--The Hellgate Wiki

Diablo II
--The Unofficial Site
--Flux's Decahedron
--Middle Earth Mod

Locations of visitors to this page

Powered by Blogger.

BlackChampagne -- no longer new; improvement also in question.: Monday Night Massacre



Tuesday, September 12, 2006  

Monday Night Massacre


I promise I'm not going to get all carried away with blogging about football this year, but I had to say something about Monday night's SD@Oak game. San Diego won, 27-0, and I enjoyed watching it since as far (nott very) as I have a favorite NFL team, the Chargers are it. So it was fun watching them batter Oakland, but the enjoyment was tainted by Oakland just being so fricking awful. The stats are painfully lopsided, and they're even worse when you consider that Oakland gained about 60 of their 129 yards during the last four minutes, after SD pulled most of their defensive starters and played a vanilla prevent defense.

I was honestly embarrassed by Oakland's play, and I blame it mostly on their coaching. The players seemed to be trying hard (at least for now) but their gameplan was unbelievably bad. They looked uncoached, as if they had done no preparation at all, and committed nearly as many stupid penalties as they always do. Their best play of the first half came when San Diego missed a field goal... and of course a Raider ran into the kicker after coming nowhere near blocking the kick, causing a penalty that gave San Diego a first down, and led to a shorter and successful field goal a few plays later.

San Diego came into the game with a great running game, good receivers, and a brand new quarterback. Every football fan in America knew that, and knew that Oakland would jam the line on defense, stuffing the running game and forcing SD's new QB to throw the ball under pressure. On defense, Oakland knew that San Diego had a terrifying front line and heavy pass rush, but that their defensive backs were suspect, so the logical course would be to throw the ball a lot, and quickly, since the pressure was always going to come hard.

What did Oakland do?

They played a soft nickel defense for most of the first half, allowing SD's all league running back to rack up 101 yards by halftime, while putting almost no pressure on SD's young QB, who threw the ball about 4 times in the entire first half, and never under any real duress. On offense Oakland called a lot of slow-developing sweeps and counter tray type runs, all of which failed since SD always had 7 or 8 guys near the line of scrimmage. And when Oakland passed their receivers all ran long patterns, which gave SD's five rushers time to collapse the pocket or sweep around the sides, leading to a near team record 9 sacks. Honestly, I can't think how Oakland could have designed their offense or defense more perfectly to play to San Diego's strengths.

If there were any real Raiders' fans, and not just a bunch of plastic halloween costume-wearing wannabes, there would be justifiable outrage amongst the Raider Nation. Their new coach humiliated the team on national TV, setting the tone for another disastrous season, and didn't even really seem to care. If Oakland were owned by someone other than Lizardman, say by George Steinbrenner, circa 1980, they'd be looking for an entire new coaching staff tomorrow.

The sad thing is that Oakland really wasn't really beaten that badly. It was only 13-0 at the half, and as one of the TV announcers said, no doubt sensing TVs clicking off all across the nation, "Oakland's only two plays from being right back in this thing." I laughed at the desperation in his voice, but he had a point, and 13-0 is far from an insurmountable lead -- so long as you don't keep doing the exact same stuff you did to dig that hole in the first half.

The Chargers went three-and-out their first 3 possessions of the 3rd quarter, all started inside their own 20. As a result, Oakland got the ball around midfield three times in a row, and with any kind of normal success would have turned that into at least 10 or 14 points. Instead they turned it into 3 punts, and SD finally moved a bit on their 4th possession of the half, when they stopped running plunges into the line on 1st and 10 and 2nd and 9, and sometimes 3rd and 7.

During the game, SD ran more or less up the middle on at least four 3rd and long situations, and made none of them. It looked quite a bit like they were playing to punt, figuring the 40 yards and time off the clock was worth it with their defense. And they were right, at least this time. It's not a strategy that would work against a real team, though. One with coaches who know what they're doing.

The story of the game was the SD defense, and Ladanian Tomlinson, who had 31 carries for 131 yards and a TD. Impressive, until you consider that he had a 58 yard break away, which means he only gaine 74 yards on his other 30 carries. And that sucks. That's unsustainable. It worked here, and the SD coach said they called the plays just for this game, and that he wouldn't have thrown more with any QB. Which is really quite a dis of Oakland's offense, when you think about it. The SD coach clearly had no worry about stopping them, as dumb as they were.

And it was dumbity, I assure you. Oakland threw about 4 quick passes in the whole game. All of them were complete, including two in a row to Randy Moss, who juked a defender or two on both and gained about 15 yards combined. They worked so well that Oakland never did it again, allowing SD's cornerbacks to get away with playing 10-12 yards back, which kept Moss from being able to beat them deep, even assuming the Oakland QB was still on his feet at that point. It was like Oakland had read some sort of, "The way we used to play football." manual, and determined that they were going to play like that. They'd throw the deep ball, they'd only run on occasion, and they'd never call a screen pass or keep tight ends in to block, and they wouldn't throw quick passes, even though the tactic worked every time they tried it, since that's not how they used to play back in the 70s and 80s, when Oakland was good.

I'm honestly depressed by this, and not just because I'm stuck watching local teams Oakland and SF every weekend, while far better games are on in every other market in the US. Although... it might be sort of fun watching Oakland play this year, if they're this bad every week. I was laughing out loud during MNF, and it's kind of the bad movie corollary: if a movie is just bad, it's no fun. But if it's beyond bad, it takes on an unintentional comedy sort of genius, and can become entertaining.

Labels:

Comments:

I have to disagree with that last paragraph. Oakland played so bad that I actually quit watching the game sometime in the third quarter. That is unprecidented in first week Monday night football history. Of course the league must have somehow known that the game was going to suck, as the Washington vs. Minnesota game was far more balanced, and at least sated the football (well, competitive football) jones that the fans have after a long off season.

One thing I am curious about is how well this game rated for tv ratings. I thought it was an odd game to be putting on Monday night in the first place, since the majority of the market is east coast, and two California teams playing isn't likely to make a lot of New Yorkers stay up until 1a.m. -especially not when it is this lop-sided. To be fair though, all the talking heads seemed to think that it was going to be a pretty balanced game, right up until halftime, that is, when they all started with the "I knew that Oakland didn't have a _________" tactic, obviously hoping that no one had watched what they said prior to the game.

As long as I am on the subject of football, I am not liking the games being on ESPN. Granted, with two games everyone who works for the ESPN got some face time this week, but if Chris Berman is going to be doing any commentary during the regular games, I may be skipping a lot of MNF. I thought that I hated John Madden's commentary, but after listening to Berman babble on, he doesn't seem so bad by comparison. Hell, at least Madden coached the game at one point, and somewhere hidden deep in the "now, here's a guy ..." statements, there is generally truth to what he says. With Chris Berman and the ESPN crew the analysis is really only about how well each of them (the commentators) knew the outcome prior to the game.

At any rate, San Diego did well last night. That could just be because my sixth grade Pop Warner team could have beaten the Raiders though.


 

Well I could never have sat through it live, but then again, I can't sit through any football game live at this point. I was out until 8:30, then at the gym until 10, while making sure not to look at any of the tvs there. I watched it on tape while enjoying a late supper, and it was fine that way.

Though I did get bored with SD's "we'll run every play since Oakland can't score anyway" offensive strategy during the punt-filled 3rd quarter.

As for national TV, I don't think they had much hope of that with the 10:30 EST kick off. The early game was for the east coast and midwest, and the late game was for the west. With teams to match. Pity they can't do that every Monday night. Besides, quit your bitching about the Raiders; it's not like you'll ever have to see them again, from your desert southwest location.


 

Oakland sucks.

But San Diego also sucks.

This is not a San Diego or Okland year.


 

Post a Comment << Home

Archives

May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2012  

All site content copyright "Flux" (Eric Bruce), 2002-2007.