BlackChampagne Home

In association with Amazon.comBuy Crap! I get 5%.
Direct donations to cover hosting expenses are also accepted.

Site Information
--What is Black Champagne?
--Cast of Characters & Things
--Your First Time.
--Design Notes
--Quote of the Day Archive
--Phrase of the Moment Archive
--Site Feedback
--Contact/Copyright Info

Blog Archives
--Blogger Archives: June 2005-
--Old Monthly Archives: Jan 2002-May 2005

Reviews Section
Movie Reviews (153)

Ten Most Recent Film Reviews:
--Infernal Affairs -- 5.5
--The Protector/Tom Yum Goong -- 6
--The Limey -- 8
--The Descent -- 6
--Oldboy -- 9.5
--Shaolin Deadly Kicks -- 7
--Mission Impossible III -- 7.5
--V for Vendetta -- 8.5
--Ghost in the Shell 2 -- 8
--Night Watch -- 7.5

Book Reviews (76)
Five Most Recent Book Reviews:
--Cat People -- 4
--Attack Poodles -- 5
--Caught Stealing -- 6
--The Dirt, by Motley Crue -- 7.5
--Harry Potter #6 -- 7

Photos Section
--Flux Photos
--Pet Photos (7 pages)
--Home Decor Photos
--Plant Photos
--Vacation Photos (12 pages)

Articles
See all 234 articles here.

Fiction
Original horror and fantasy short stories.

Mail Bags
Index Page

Features
--Links
--Slang: Internet
--Slang: Dirty
--Slang: Wankisms
--Slang: Sex Acts
--Slang: Fulldeckisms
--Hot or Not?
--Truths in Advertising

Band Name Ratings
(350 Rock Bands Listed)
FAQ -- Feedback
A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- Q -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W -- X -- Y -- Z

Hellgate: London
--The Unofficial HGL Site
--The Hellgate Wiki

Diablo II
--The Unofficial Site
--Flux's Decahedron
--Middle Earth Mod

Locations of visitors to this page

Powered by Blogger.

BlackChampagne -- no longer new; improvement also in question.: Raiders!



Sunday, September 17, 2006  

Raiders!


So with typical Bay Area NFL television options, I taped the early game, Oak@Balt, just to have something to FF through once I got up in the afternoon. I knew I wasn't going to watch StL@SF live, anyway. I mostly taped the Raiders for a laugh; they were humiliated 27-0 at home last week, and they were playing a Ravens team that won 27-0 last week. I joked about 54-0 being the likely outcome, but I didn't expect anything like that, mostly because I didn't think Baltimore had much of an offense.

I still don't, after skimming through their 28-6 loss with much laughter, though this game was never in doubt. Oakland wasn't sacked 9 times like last week; they were sacked 6 times, and added 3 INTs, 5 fumbles (3 lost), and a general early season Bad News Bears vibe that would have absolutely ruined my weekend if I were a Raiders fan. Truly, truly embarassing. They've been outscored 55-6 on the season, and that's definitely on merit. They looked uncoached against San Diego last week; incredibly inept in their game plan. This week that wasn't as bad, mostly since Baltimore didn't exactly laser in on the Raiders' weaknesses. Oakland's execution was astonishingly inept though. I'd say it was like a high school team, but I think even teenagers play better fundamental football.

Aaron Brooks started at QB, and got benched after handing of twice, then fumbling the third and fourth snap he took from center. Baltimore recovered both inside Oakland's 25, and Oakland put in 2nd year QB Andrew Walter on their third series. Walter played the rest of the game, and also fumbled twice on snaps, but did manage to fall on both of those. He was less lucky against the pass rush, fumbling one that got run back 60 yards to set up another field goal, and throwing three picks, though two came late when Oakland looked increasingly ragged with desperation.

It was 28-6, but honestly, I wasn't that impressed by Baltimore. Their defense was opportunistic, but relatively porous, and they kind of outsmarted themselves with a variety of defenses that simply weren't necessary against Oakland's incompetent offense. Last week San Diego just jail breaked all game; never rushing fewer than 4, usually sending 5 or 6, and pressuring or sacking the QB on nearly every play. Oakland had no answers then, and didn't this week either, since any time Baltimore rushed more than 4 guys they either got a sack or put heavy pressure on the QB. Fortunately for Oakland's sanity, Baltimore got bored doing the same thing that was working, and started rushing just 3 or 4 guys while dropping others off into various zone coverage schemes, all of which were pointless since Oakland still doesn't have any quick passing plays. Everything requires a long, 7 step drop, and 90% of Oakland's passes are either curls to the sidelines, 20 yard lob passes to the sidelines, or crossing passes to big tight ends about 15 yards over the middle. They arne't any good, but occasionally they'd complete 2 or 3 in a row and move the ball a bit. They did get a couple of field goals, at least.

The bright spot, if you can call it that, was Oakland's defense, which didn't play poorly, considering. Baltimore kicked 4 field goals, but if you look at the drive charts for those, they were like 11 yards, 18 yards, 14 yards, etc. It was 9-0 in the first quarter, but Baltimore only had about 50 yards at that point thanks to a long kickoff return and Brooks' two fumbles at the line. Baltimore had a good TD drive just before half, but that was it until they scored with a few minutes to go, when Oakland's defense looked to have given up after their offense turned it over for the sixth time. Baltimore only has 264 yards, and given the field position they inherited, they really should have put up 40+. They're 2-0, but McNair threw 33 passes for just 143 yards, and looked very slow. He just dinked and dunked little drop offs to running backs and tight ends, for the most part, and Oakland sacked him twice, pressured him regularly, and largely controlled Baltimore, until that last drive of the game.

As for Oakland, it's tempting to say they have to improve... but why? Their defense will keep them in some games, but with their horrendous offensive coaching and play calling, and their crappy offensive line, it'll take some real breaks or a truly stupid opponent to allow them more than 14 points all season. The good news, for me at least, is that they're got their bye next week, which means I should have the option of watching two real teams play at 10am on Sunday.

Elsewhere, my nominal favorite San Diego won big again, and they've now outscored their two opponents 67-7 on the season. True, they warmed up Nebraska style with a pair of Division II cream puffs (I'm not sure if Oakland was Louisana Tech or Nicholls State, but it hardly matters.) but in the NFL, all the wins count the same. SD's first real game comes in two weeks, after their bye, when they face Baltimore, who will certainly be 3-0 at that point after massacring their third hapless opponent.

Incidentally, what happened to parity? Why are there so many awful teams this season? Kansas City, Oakland, Tennessee, Cleveland, Detroit, Green Bay, Tampa Bay, and Houston are all 0-2 and all have looked horrible in both of their games. And I'm not even mentioning Carolina, Miami, and the loser of tonight's Dallas/Washington game, who are all also 0-2, though somewhat less deservingly. Meanwhile, Chicago's two game total is 60-7, San Diego's is 67-7, Atlanta's is 34-9, and Baltimore's is 55-6, largely thanks to a pair of games apiece against the flock of aforementioned tomato cans.

Labels:

Comments:

The saddest moment in the Oakland game was after Baltimore punted from about the 40, and one of their coverage guys downed it at the 5. The announcer must have been on autopilot when he said, "Forcing the Raiders to drive the length of the field."

I laughed and thought, "More like setting up a safety." and sure enough, after two runs up the middle for no yardage, Oakland called one of their slow, seven-step drops on 3rd down, Baltimore swarmed, and down went the QB.


 

I thought exactly the same thing when the ball was downed at their five. In fact, I was rather surprised that it didn't happen until third down. I do wonder why that huge lineman was 5 steps deep in his own end zone to run into the quarterback though; if he had not been there it probably wouldn't have resulted in a safety.

I really wonder why Oakland continued to run the ball. True, they were only down by 13 at the half, thanks to a combination of their good defense and Baltimore's stale offense, but they were averaging just over a yard a carry. They had a total of 39 rushing yards, 35 of which came on three plays late in the game when Baltimore was leaving only 4 at the line. It's not as if they were going to run it enough to fake out the defense on a play action pass. They could have just gone deep on every play and it probably wouldn't have resulted in any more interceptions than the short pass game, hell, maybe they would have scored a touchdown.

It is fun to watch the Raiders get their asses handed to them though. At least it would be if they had actual fans to gloat to. Problem is, about 80% of the people you see wearing Raiders gear probably didn't even know they were playing yesterday (I bet there is a percentage that don't even know they are a football team).


 

Post a Comment << Home

Archives

May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2012  

All site content copyright "Flux" (Eric Bruce), 2002-2007.