BlackChampagne Home

In association with Amazon.comBuy Crap! I get 5%.
Direct donations to cover hosting expenses are also accepted.

Site Information
--What is Black Champagne?
--Cast of Characters & Things
--Your First Time.
--Design Notes
--Quote of the Day Archive
--Phrase of the Moment Archive
--Site Feedback
--Contact/Copyright Info

Blog Archives
--Blogger Archives: June 2005-
--Old Monthly Archives: Jan 2002-May 2005

Reviews Section
Movie Reviews (153)

Ten Most Recent Film Reviews:
--Infernal Affairs -- 5.5
--The Protector/Tom Yum Goong -- 6
--The Limey -- 8
--The Descent -- 6
--Oldboy -- 9.5
--Shaolin Deadly Kicks -- 7
--Mission Impossible III -- 7.5
--V for Vendetta -- 8.5
--Ghost in the Shell 2 -- 8
--Night Watch -- 7.5

Book Reviews (76)
Five Most Recent Book Reviews:
--Cat People -- 4
--Attack Poodles -- 5
--Caught Stealing -- 6
--The Dirt, by Motley Crue -- 7.5
--Harry Potter #6 -- 7

Photos Section
--Flux Photos
--Pet Photos (7 pages)
--Home Decor Photos
--Plant Photos
--Vacation Photos (12 pages)

Articles
See all 234 articles here.

Fiction
Original horror and fantasy short stories.

Mail Bags
Index Page

Features
--Links
--Slang: Internet
--Slang: Dirty
--Slang: Wankisms
--Slang: Sex Acts
--Slang: Fulldeckisms
--Hot or Not?
--Truths in Advertising

Band Name Ratings
(350 Rock Bands Listed)
FAQ -- Feedback
A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- Q -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W -- X -- Y -- Z

Hellgate: London
--The Unofficial HGL Site
--The Hellgate Wiki

Diablo II
--The Unofficial Site
--Flux's Decahedron
--Middle Earth Mod

Locations of visitors to this page

Powered by Blogger.

BlackChampagne -- no longer new; improvement also in question.: Brain-Tickling Flops



Saturday, September 20, 2008  

Brain-Tickling Flops


While surfing idly this evening, I somehow wound on up the BoxOfficeMojo list of worst grossing, wide opening films ever. That is, movies that opened on more than 2500 screens (in the US) and made the least money. It's a fascinating collection, full of "tip of the memory" type names. Films I almost remember hearing about, or maybe seeing a trailer for; but not quite. Others don't even generate that much mental near-friction. I look at the name, I paste it into the search box on MetaCritic and look at a synopsis and some reviews, and I'm still left with a scowling, WTF expression. (As seen below.)

Who made these movies? How did they get on 2500+ screens, which means they had major ad campaigns, without me having any memory of them? I'm not that big a movie fan, and I pretty much ignore family movies and chick flicks, but I watch a lot of trailers online, I see a lot of ads on websites, I used to read Entertainment Weakly regularly...

It's understandable when the movie came out 6 or 8 years ago, since I know I've just forgotten. But when the movie was released a few years ago, or last year, or even last month? The worst performance ever goes to The Rocker, which opened on nearly 2800 screens, and earned $2.6m for the weekend. If you're too stoned/drunk/lazy to do the math, that's about $930 per screen, for the weekend. You figure that's $7 a ticket (It's around $10 most theaters in the Bay Area, but we'll include matinee discounts and kid's prices.) So let's be generous and say 150 tickets sold, per theater, per weekend. The movie probably had 4 show times per day per screen, over 3 days. So 150 / 12 = 12 people per show. Nothing like seeing a "comedy" with a full house to boost the laughs!

Backtracking slightly, I only know The Rocker was a comedy since I researched. When I first saw the list, I noted it, then returned, then clicked the link to the movie's page. My thoughts ran as follows, "What was that date? 08/20/08. Wait... that's August 20th. This year. That's one month ago. What? The biggest flop in the history of widely released movies was just last month? Why don't I have any idea what this movie is? Oh... I guess that's only logical, really."

I still had no idea what it was from the Box Office Mojo page, which had a poster for ease of recognition. I had to search the name on MetaCritic to be sure it was real. It was, and I read the synopsis, and I still had no idea what it was. It wasn't until I read one of the reviews (which aren't that horrible, surprisingly) that I got a grain of recollection. I actually seen a trailer for that film, at some point this summer. It looked horrible; some kind of School of Rock/Spinal Tap rip off with one of those pudgy, white, late-30s manchildren losers Hollywood "comedies" have lately grown so found of vomiting onto the screen. He was almost a rock star 20 years ago, and now his nephew, or something, has a band and they need a drummer, and he joins up and wacky, acid-tinged hijinks ensue.

Clearly I wasn't alone in thinking it looked stupid and immediately forgetting it, given the record breaking opening weekend, and total gross of $6.2m, or less than 1/3 of the production/marketing costs.

At least some memory of that movie came back to me, eventually. Others on the list rang no bells, even after I researched them. Even when they flopped within the past few years. Lucky You? Rumor Has It? Firehouse Dog? Raise Your Voice? Zoom? The funny thing about each of those, once I attempted to refresh my memory by reading the synopsis on MetaCritic, is that they all reminded me of some other movie. None of them seemed in any way original; they were all rip offs of some other successful film, or at least looked like it, and I think that might have been the secret of their failure. Potential viewers saw a trailer or an ad, saw nothing new or exciting, and mentally filed it as a lame derivative of some other, similar, more successful, not necessarily any good, movie. Most of them have really bad titles, too. Generic, non-evocative, or instantly forgettable.

Perhaps the king (queen?) of that is this film, which didn't make the list since it only opened on 1121 theaters. It was mentioned in an article about the weekend with the highest number of wide releases, which was last Oct 19-21. Unsurprisingly, most of them fell through the cracks, led by the bet-losing title, Sarah Landon and the Paranormal Hour, which starred no one you've ever heard of, and which features a perfect image on the MetaCritic page. I inserted it earlier in this update. That's the film's "star," I assume, and she's (helpfully) making exactly the face most of the rest of us made when we read the title of the movie. It earned $858,415 total in the US, had no international release, and made $586,283 its opening weekend, on 1121 theaters. That's a whopping $522 per screen! Enough to make The Rocker seem like a hit, in comparison.

Labels:

Comments:

I saw the trailer for The Rocker, and it looked thoroughly middling until the part in the middle where they brought out the "OH MY GOD, A BILLION HITS ON YOUTUBE!" trope.

Then I knew it would be completely stupid.


 

Post a Comment << Home

Archives

May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2012  

All site content copyright "Flux" (Eric Bruce), 2002-2007.