Wait, you're basing this condemnation of Fox on a 1 minute clip featuring happy people (presumably in Amsterdam) and three e-stats, despite the fact that the Fox clip referenced made no claims in regards to any of the stats?

The only thing mentioned was corruption, which was not addressed by the stats. Who is right? Hell if I know, but I do know that this video brought us no closer to the answer than the O'Reilly-sponsored diatribe.

PS: I would advocate an end to sex ed programs if it wouldn't mean an end to any and all sex education. It is a job for parents, but it seems to be a job most of them have long since left behind.

I also like how the focus was so tightly on abstinence programs; sex ed doesn't work in general, no matter what you say about it. I'd like to see the stats of a pro-sex program, wherein the teachers advocated sexual encounters. I'd be willing to bet it wouldn't cause any more of a blip compared to the control group than this sex ed program.

 

You sort of alluded to it, but the U.S. drug policy has also led to an erosion of civil liberties, the paramilitarization of local police departments, and the burden of proof being moved to the defendant as opposed to the state.