Where's the men?

 

lanthanide, we don't want to see any nekid men.

What are you, a "maricon" ???

 

I agree completely with Ianth actually.

 

Generally speaking, the only nude men I've seen in fake celeb nudes are the un-retouched pornstars who were in the original picture, before they cut Jenna Jameson's head off and replaced it with Oprah's. Or whoever's.

There must be nudes of male celebs though; it's not like women and gay men can't run photoshop.

It would be interesting if they were just about unheard of, though. What would that say sociologically about straight men and their/our desire to see more of female stars than naturally possible, especially if the desire wasn't shared by gay men and hetero women?

 

I think gay men simply know it is fake and therefore don't care. It's very easy to go see hot, well-built guys with big cocks on the net. So who cares if you take someone's head and stick it on one of those bodies? They're a dime a dozen. What (gay) men want to see are the actual bodies of the stars, to see how they measure up to everyone else.

This is evidenced by all the blogs that run screeds of spy-camera pics of blurry undressed celebs, rather than simply plastering doctored photos up for everyone to look at.

 

Well straight men know the women are fake too (in most cases), and with half the women there are nudes of them anyway, from a movie or something. The appetite to see more shots of them, and more explicit nudity, never seems to fade, though. I've seen fake nudes of porn stars, if that makes any sense.

 

Yeah, but straight men are weird. You yourself have commented on how odd it is that people buy Penthouse and Playboy, even though the stuff that is in them is the same, month after month, each centerfold looking as plasticy and fake as the next.

So it seems to me that straight men know they're fake, but they look anyway because its more tits/ass and they're not very discriminating. Whereas gay men know they're fake and therefore don't bother to look at them, because they're more interested in the actual people, rather than just a naked body.

I guess to find out if what I'm theorizing is remotely true, looking at porn mags/videos would be a good way - see if straight porn includes (or has accessible) information about the women involved, compare to the amount of information available for male pornstars in gay porn. This would tend to suggest that gay men like to know who they're looking at, whereas straight men don't care as much.

 

On a totally unrelated note, Blackchampagne still appears as "Naked, for the ladies" on my favorites list. How many years ago was that?