BlackChampagne Home

In association with Amazon.comBuy Crap! I get 5%.
Direct donations to cover hosting expenses are also accepted.

Site Information
--What is Black Champagne?
--Cast of Characters & Things
--Your First Time.
--Design Notes
--Quote of the Day Archive
--Phrase of the Moment Archive
--Site Feedback
--Contact/Copyright Info

Blog Archives
--Blogger Archives: June 2005-
--Old Monthly Archives: Jan 2002-May 2005

Reviews Section
Movie Reviews (153)

Ten Most Recent Film Reviews:
--Infernal Affairs -- 5.5
--The Protector/Tom Yum Goong -- 6
--The Limey -- 8
--The Descent -- 6
--Oldboy -- 9.5
--Shaolin Deadly Kicks -- 7
--Mission Impossible III -- 7.5
--V for Vendetta -- 8.5
--Ghost in the Shell 2 -- 8
--Night Watch -- 7.5

Book Reviews (76)
Five Most Recent Book Reviews:
--Cat People -- 4
--Attack Poodles -- 5
--Caught Stealing -- 6
--The Dirt, by Motley Crue -- 7.5
--Harry Potter #6 -- 7

Photos Section
--Flux Photos
--Pet Photos (7 pages)
--Home Decor Photos
--Plant Photos
--Vacation Photos (12 pages)

Articles
See all 234 articles here.

Fiction
Original horror and fantasy short stories.

Mail Bags
Index Page

Features
--Links
--Slang: Internet
--Slang: Dirty
--Slang: Wankisms
--Slang: Sex Acts
--Slang: Fulldeckisms
--Hot or Not?
--Truths in Advertising

Band Name Ratings
(350 Rock Bands Listed)
FAQ -- Feedback
A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- Q -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W -- X -- Y -- Z

Hellgate: London
--The Unofficial HGL Site
--The Hellgate Wiki

Diablo II
--The Unofficial Site
--Flux's Decahedron
--Middle Earth Mod

Locations of visitors to this page

Powered by Blogger.

BlackChampagne -- no longer new; improvement also in question.: Too tired for politics



Tuesday, October 06, 2009  

Too tired for politics


In recent months, I've been thinking and reading a lot about the current, scorched-earth, fact-free state of political "discourse" in the US. I've not often blogged about it because um... words are hard. Well, more accurately words are hard when I want to semi-concisely sum up a vast and sprawling issue; a task that would require a great deal of "and this other guy said" type commentary, since I'm highly unlikely to find/make the time to dig up links for everything.

Too much real life work and writing, weekends spent primarily engaged in recreation with my new girlfriend Elle, etc. This past weekend was more of the same, with Elle overnight at my place on Friday night, much romping on Saturday, before we attended a wedding of a friend of hers from grad school on Saturday. I stayed over there that night, and we crashed fairly early since we hadn't gotten much sleep the night before. I left her place earlier than usual Sunday afternoon (usually it's dark by the time I depart after an overnight), but the problem with the Bay Area on a nice weekend is hella traffic getting into/out of The City. Thus was my return trip twice as long and ten times as frustrating, and by the time I got home the neck ache I'd awakened with was much worse, and I was feeling weird chills and sudden patches of goosebumps all over my body. I took a hot bath, had a bowl of chicken soup and some fruit, and drank some OJ, but by 10pm I was definitely on a downward spiral. Not that I'd have blogged something then anyway, but I had hoped to spend a few hours on fiction.

I crashed by 10:30, shivering and unable to get warm even with heavy clothing on and wrapped tightly in warm covers. I woke up at 2, predictably soaked in sweat, partially thanks to Jinx's fully-extended, log-like presence between my thighs/knees/ankles. Extracting myself and crawling out of bed was a torturous exercise, made somewhat easier by the fact that I was back to sleep 10 seconds after I threw down my sweaty clothing and returned to bed.

The rest of the night, morning, and afternoon went pretty much like that. I'd wake up every couple of hours, sweaty and under Jinx, take a long drink of water from the bedside bottle, move over a few feet and flip over the pillow in search of a dry spot, and fall instantly back to sleep. This charade continued well into the day, and it wasn't until near 1pm that I felt capable of rising and functioning. I've felt fairly okay all day, though still obviously not well. Periodic chills and painfully sore muscles (neck and back mostly), a condition which several hot showers and a delicate, yoga-intensive evening gym visit did something to ameliorate.

And now I'm quite eager to get back to bed (despite sleeping 13+ hours last night) making a (presumably) quick blog post just to throw in a couple of links to recent, trenchant, political articles that have been squatting in browser tabs for the last several days. Worse yet, I've got a long-awaited 1-on-1, 30-minute phone interview with the lead designer of Diablo 3 tomorrow morning, and I really need to spend at least a couple of hours further paring down, honing, and prioritizing my overlong list of questions.


Incidentally, they say it takes misery and despair to spur good writing, and while that's overrated (since misery and despair much more often spur lethargy), but any reader of this blog would be excused for agreeing with that concept, based on my recent performance. I wasn't posting a great deal over the past year+, but at least back when I was girlfriend-less and vexed by the cock-teasing and mixed-messages I chose to ignore/overlook/misinterpret from the IG, I semi-regularly wrote something amusingly-anguished and self-absorbed about my psychological state. Now that I'm in a happy and stable relationship with code name Elle, I'm not writing much about it, and I'm busy every damn weekend which leaves me no time to blog anyway.

May your audience's online reading happiness exist at a directly inverse proportion to the contentedness in your own personal life.

That digressed, here's the political news posts I thought worth sharing.

This first one sums quite well, I think, the scorched earth approach of the modern Republican party to virtually every political issue. When there is massive celebration of America failing to score an Olympics hosting gig, the sort of behavior that would have prompted enough "Anti-American!" cries from those self-same celebrators if done by leftists under a Republican administration, we have entered some sort of bizarro political world.
Politics as Religion in America

Perhaps the single most profound change in our political culture over the last 30 years has been the transformation of conservatism from a political movement, with all the limitations, hedges and forbearances of politics, into a kind of fundamentalist religious movement, with the absolute certainty of religious belief.

I don't mean "religious belief" literally. This transformation is less a function of the alliance between Protestant evangelicals, their fellow travelers and the right (though that alliance has had its effect) than it is a function of a belief in one's own rightness so unshakable that it is not subject to political caveats. In short, what we have in America today is a political fundamentalism, with all the characteristics of religious fundamentalism and very few of the characteristics of politics.

For centuries, American democracy as a process of conflict resolution has been based on give-and-take; negotiation; compromise; the acceptance of the fact that the majority rules, with respect for minority rights; and, above all, on an agreement to abide by the results of a majority vote. It takes compromise, even defeat, in stride because it is a fluid system. As historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr. once put it, the beauty of a democracy is that the minority always has the possibility of becoming the majority.

Religious fundamentalism, on the other hand, rests on immutable truths that cannot be negotiated, compromised or changed. In this, it is diametrically opposed to liberal democracy as we have practiced it in America. Democrats of every political stripe may defend democracy to the death, but very few would defend individual policies to the death. You don't wage bloody crusades for banking regulation or the minimum wage or even healthcare reform. When politics becomes religion, however, policy too becomes a matter of life and death, as we have all seen.

I also thought Krugman's new editorial hit the nail on the head, as he took the fairly amazing, "they even hate the Olympics?" issue and segued it into a discussion of the Republican opposition to Obama's health care reform efforts.
The Politics of SpiteTo be sure, while celebrating America's rebuff by the Olympic Committee was puerile, it didn't do any real harm. But the same principle of spite has determined Republican positions on more serious matters, with potentially serious consequences -- in particular, in the debate over health care reform.

Now, it's understandable that many Republicans oppose Democratic plans to extend insurance coverage -- just as most Democrats opposed President Bush's attempt to convert Social Security into a sort of giant 401(k). The two parties do, after all, have different philosophies about the appropriate role of government.

But the tactics of the two parties have been different. In 2005, when Democrats campaigned against Social Security privatization, their arguments were consistent with their underlying ideology: they argued that replacing guaranteed benefits with private accounts would expose retirees to too much risk.

The Republican campaign against health care reform, by contrast, has shown no such consistency. For the main G.O.P. line of attack is the claim -- based mainly on lies about death panels and so on -- that reform will undermine Medicare. And this line of attack is utterly at odds both with the party's traditions and with what conservatives claim to believe.

Think about just how bizarre it is for Republicans to position themselves as the defenders of unrestricted Medicare spending. First of all, the modern G.O.P. considers itself the party of Ronald Reagan -- and Reagan was a fierce opponent of Medicare's creation, warning that it would destroy American freedom. (Honest.) In the 1990s, Newt Gingrich tried to force drastic cuts in Medicare financing. And in recent years, Republicans have repeatedly decried the growth in entitlement spending -- growth that is largely driven by rising health care costs.

But the Obama administration's plan to expand coverage relies in part on savings from Medicare. And since the G.O.P. opposes anything that might be good for Mr. Obama, it has become the passionate defender of ineffective medical procedures and overpayments to insurance companies.
I'd add discussion, but um... 24-hour semi-flu. More later, mortality permitting.

Labels: , ,

Comments:

Look into APF (American Police Force) and their camp in Montana. They are not American's but international group of Mercenaries planning on running a prison in America...could this be a FEMA camp?


 

My god, you've got the swine flu! It's the end of this webpage, and possibly the world, as we know it!

Okay, my media alarmism is done. Hope you get to feeling better.


 

Trust me: as a person who dislikes both of the major parties, I can assure you that each of them treats their core principles like religious fundamentals. There is almost no chance of a factual argument making headway. Each of them flip whenever it is convenient to undermine the other party. (Where are all of the huge demonstrations against the Afghan and Iraq wars now that Obama is President? Where were the Tea Party protestors when Bush was expanding government spending and entitlements astronomically?) This type of "scorched-earth" discourse is not limited to either side.

*Cough* And yes, I realize that I treat my own Libertarian beliefs as, essentially, religious tenets. I would argue that I'm at least consistent with them, however.


 

Do you realize you can't protest anymore? You need a permit. Cindy Sheeehan was arrested in front of the white house protesting the Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq since they don't issue permits for demonstrations in DC. During the G20 in Pittsburgh countless people were arrested, look for the martial law videos of the G20 on YouTube that the mainstream media failed to report.


 

There were endless news items about gestapo police actions during the last RNC in Minneapolis. No, americans aren't entirely free to protest their government. Claiming it's something new = historical ignorance. There was vastly more abusive spying and interference into every sort of dissident group at virtually every time in american history than there is now. Just no one had conspiracy internet sites to spread the black helicopter word in the COINTELPRO days.

It's not as if public protesting is a lost art; the tea baggers have certainly been doing a lot of it lately.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&num=30&ei=NdPNSvz2LZOAsgOhtMHCDg&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&ved=0CAoQBSgA&q=teabagger+demonstrations&spell=1

Admittedly, they wildly inflate their crowd counts, but that they have 100 instead of 1000, or 30k instead of 2m isn't due to some insidious government crowd control; it's due to them being a fringe movement with fairly few followers.


 

I liked this:

http://www.theonion.com/content/news/obama_health_care_plan_would_give


 

The main thing is that there is no left/right, they all work together. They are backed by bankers that choose what path to follow. Come on, Obama the Nobel Prize, what has he done. Increased the troops in Afghanastan to protect the Opium Fields and not really brought troops home, but moved them around. I thought he was stopping the wars. There is no difference between him and the previous puppet.


 

Obama has made huge differences in relations with Russia and seems to be intent on trying to reduce the world's arsenal of nuclear weapons, two things that the previous puppet *definitely* didn't do.

Within your own country you might not see much reason for him to win the award, but the international community, having suffered through Bush, certainly do see Obama in a very different light.


 

Kinda funny; all you have to do to win the international community over is talk about how crappy America is. What I'd like to see is an advance in the dialog, but the international community isn't interested. They just want to see Obama squirm trying to win their approval.

In regards to the original topic, though, I'm always surprised to read the bloviation of the left. Why? It matches the rhetoric of the far right to the letter. I mean literally.

Personally, I see it this way: a big government is a bad one. People don't seem to understand that it isn't the government's money being spent. It is our money, and personally, I don't like the idea of my money going to special interests, lobbyists, people too fucking lazy to work, the 650lb diabetic with no health insurance, or the geriatric who never learned how to save. Yeah, it sucks that those people won't have a safety net in the government. But guess what? America gives about 300 billion dollars to charity annually -- and that's with upwards of 20% of their income going straight to Uncle Sam. Given those numbers, I'm of the mind that those truly in need are not likely to be left wanting.

PS: Majority rule is a lie. There's no way in hell any rightist will be able to repeal a single element of the nanny state that the left has been working to construct in the US. While the individual may be principled, people as a collective won't let big brother shut the grab bag once it's been opened. Now, opening it wider, on the other hand...


 

Post a Comment << Home

Archives

May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2012  

All site content copyright "Flux" (Eric Bruce), 2002-2007.